A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such parts are topic to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments, an image which includes since develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Instances documented, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became The most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been covered in detail with the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute within the legal timeline.
In the core on the dispute is really a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as created, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of setting up files, maps, and situations connected on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their motion is determined by problem for environmental safety and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting as a substitute that it is about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got described their long-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply trying to produce a household home in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Special Spot of Conservation and say that each one functions have been completed according to Experienced guidance and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea during a storm, will not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute more than design Paul Feely and René Collier of wall at coastal web site has become a shorthand description for your circumstance that lots of observers see as more and more common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become additional contentious.
The Irish Times short article about René Collier observed which the businessman experienced previously been involved with nearby advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very various professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.